Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

neteria: init at 1.0.3.160123.05 #71256

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

neteria: init at 1.0.3.160123.05 #71256

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+24 −0

Conversation

oxzi
Copy link
Member

@oxzi oxzi commented Oct 16, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Motivation for this change

This PR adds the Neteria framework for Python.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

Sorry, something went wrong.

@oxzi
neteria: init at 1.0.3.160123.05

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
gregberge Greg Bergé
GPG key ID: C460B6AE35844C34
Verified
Learn about vigilant mode
70e51d9
@oxzi oxzi requested a review from FRidh as a code owner October 16, 2019 20:54
@ofborg ofborg bot added 6.topic: python 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Oct 16, 2019
@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

This repo hasn't received any love in 3+ years, what's the motivation on adding it?

@oxzi
Copy link
Member Author

oxzi commented Oct 17, 2019

@jonringer You've got a valid point. I needed this library for a third-party tool, but on the other hand this does not necessary needs to be in the nixpkgs. Thanks anyway (:

@oxzi oxzi closed this Oct 17, 2019
@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

If it was semi-active, I would have not problems bringing it in. Trying to maintain stale packages can be very tiring.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@FRidh FRidh

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: python 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@oxzi @jonringer