Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mattermost: 5.9.0 -> 5.15.0 #69125

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 13, 2020
Merged

mattermost: 5.9.0 -> 5.15.0 #69125

merged 3 commits into from Feb 13, 2020

Conversation

jslight90
Copy link
Contributor

@jslight90 jslight90 commented Sep 19, 2019

Motivation for this change

Software update

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from ryantm and fpletz September 20, 2019 00:03
@jslight90 jslight90 changed the title mattermost: 5.9.0 -> 5.15.0 WIP: mattermost: 5.9.0 -> 5.15.0 Sep 20, 2019
@tomfitzhenry
Copy link
Contributor

@jslight90 , is this still WIP?

@jslight90 jslight90 changed the title WIP: mattermost: 5.9.0 -> 5.15.0 mattermost: 5.9.0 -> 5.15.0 Nov 25, 2019
@jslight90
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jslight90 , is this still WIP?

No, I forgot to update it. We have about 50 users and have been using 5.15.0 for about 2 months without any issues.

@bgamari
Copy link
Contributor

bgamari commented Feb 13, 2020

It sounds like this can be merged.

@nh2
Copy link
Contributor

nh2 commented May 29, 2020

This version did not work for me: #89194 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants