Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update: changelog for 0.6.0 #193

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

frosch123
Copy link
Member

blocked by #173

@glx22
Copy link
Contributor

glx22 commented Jul 2, 2021

Waiting on #212 or #220 ?

@2TallTyler
Copy link
Member

For what it's worth, I plan on using the profit callback in my new industry set, once these issues are resolved. So it's not just fixing something nobody uses. 😃

@andythenorth
Copy link
Contributor

blocked by #173

#173 merged 23rd May

@andythenorth
Copy link
Contributor

andythenorth commented Aug 15, 2021

Additions since March 3rd:

Changes

  • add constants GROUNDSPRITE_GRASS, GROUNDSPRITE_DESERT_2_2, GROUNDSPRITE_GRASS_1_3, GROUNDSPRITE_GRASS_2_3, GROUNDSPRITE_GRASS_3_3
  • add builtin functions for round() and sqrt()
  • warn when a deprecated constant is used
  • progress display shows input filename when reading files
  • improve error message when invalid features are used
  • add plural form 14 for Romanian
  • do not check plural forms of translations
  • no longer accept iso-codes as grflangid (removes undocumented feature)
  • add industry variable for 'town_index' (var 0x41)

Fixes

  • town_euclidean_dist was returning incorrect value
  • rename MAP_TYPE_RECTANGULAR to MAP_TYPE_SQUARE
  • LZ77 fixes for compatibility with Python 3.9+
  • access to persistent-storage of towns was broken
  • use most likely defined position when reporting error

@glx22
Copy link
Contributor

glx22 commented Aug 15, 2021

LZ77 fixes can be merged as 3.9+ I think

@andythenorth
Copy link
Contributor

LZ77 fixes can be merged as 3.9+ I think

Done

@andythenorth
Copy link
Contributor

This PR replaced by #232

@glx22 glx22 closed this in #232 Aug 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants