Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate the gui-dev branch over to the new submodule format #181

Closed
wants to merge 264 commits into from

Conversation

tarunik
Copy link
Collaborator

@tarunik tarunik commented Sep 23, 2020

This changeset migrates the gui-dev branch to the new submodule format and brings it up-to-date with HEAD. Note that this replaces gui-dev wholesale -- trying to merge master into gui-dev broke the submodules, hence the complexity here.

azonenberg and others added 30 commits April 14, 2019 02:05
Include basic procedure to build and run glscopeclient on GNU/ Linux (Debian/Ubuntu)
Created basic README.md and Updated CMakeLists add glm check and add FFTS check with
Also use out-of-tree builds for scopehal.
Search for libffts in ~/.local as well
README: reformat to use block code tags
…dge (TODO non-x86 support) as a reasonable compromise between binary portability and performance
azonenberg and others added 27 commits September 15, 2020 02:44
…or the selected instrument and viewing properties for them. No support for changing trigger settings yet.
… later, but for now it can be changed by the trigger properties dialog. Fixes ngscopeclient#12.
…copeclient#174). Doesn't do anything yet. Added foreground color customization support.
This was needed as master couldn't be merged into gui-dev cleanly due to the
submodule refactoring.
@tarunik tarunik closed this Sep 23, 2020
@tarunik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tarunik commented Sep 23, 2020

Abandoning this PR due to merge issues, will resubmit with a different branch name so that it can be merged properly.

@tarunik tarunik deleted the gui-dev branch September 23, 2020 02:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants