New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
viw: init at 20171029 #96285
viw: init at 20171029 #96285
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added some requested changes.
I also wonder if it makes sense to add this to nixpkgs. It does not seem to be maintained anymore (the last commit is ~3 years ago). Also I wonder if it has any users. Perhaps this fits the NUR better?
It is not updated because it is very stable and simple I think. About the NUR: well, I need to study it! This being the case, maybe I will just reformat the expression locally and drop this PR. |
I didn't want to discourage submitting anything to nixpkgs. I was just not certain ;). |
@danieldk ping! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cleaned up installPhase
a little. LGTM.
Result of nixpkgs-review pr 96285
1
1 package built:
- viw
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)