Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

index: Rename "isolated" to "declarative" example #587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 28, 2020

Conversation

andir
Copy link
Member

@andir andir commented Sep 28, 2020

As there is no isolation and all of these shells are still able to wipe
all of your data we should probably not call them "isolated". They are
probably better described as declarative as that is what is happening
here.

As there is no isolation and all of these shells are still able to wipe
all of your data we should probably not call them "isolated". They are
probably better described as `declarative` as that is what is happening
here.
@garbas
Copy link
Member

garbas commented Sep 28, 2020

I think this is an improvement but it still can be improved (in later PRs).

Nobody uses Nix because it is declarative, but because there is an important benefit of "declarativness". To newcomers this benefit might not be obvious and might be even misunderstood as "unneeded complexity". I think it would be much better to just talk in terms of benefits of features and avoid being misunderstood.

But right now I don't have a better idea. @andir maybe you have some.

@garbas garbas merged commit e7bbd6f into NixOS:master Sep 28, 2020
@andir andir deleted the patch-1 branch September 28, 2020 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants