Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

sbt: 1.3.13 -> 1.4.0 #99616

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 5, 2020
Merged

sbt: 1.3.13 -> 1.4.0 #99616

merged 1 commit into from Oct 5, 2020

Conversation

avdv
Copy link
Member

@avdv avdv commented Oct 5, 2020

Motivation for this change

New upstream release: https://github.com/sbt/sbt/releases/tag/v1.4.0

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Previously: #99612

@avdv
sbt: 1.3.13 -> 1.4.0
e92691b 
* remove broken piccolo.link
* add symlink to native `sbtn` client executable to `bin`
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from NeQuissimus October 5, 2020 10:23
@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus merged commit 41a6a77 into NixOS:master Oct 5, 2020
@avdv avdv deleted the sbt-1.4.0 branch October 5, 2020 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus NeQuissimus approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@avdv @NeQuissimus