Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[20.09] digikam: 6.4.0 -> 7.1.0 #99473

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 3, 2020
Merged

[20.09] digikam: 6.4.0 -> 7.1.0 #99473

merged 1 commit into from Oct 3, 2020

Conversation

ttuegel
Copy link
Member

@ttuegel ttuegel commented Oct 3, 2020 •
edited

Motivation for this change

Update to digikam 7.1.0 and fix dependencies.

Fixes: #98879

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ttuegel
digikam: 6.4.0 -> 7.1.0
a4fea83 
(cherry picked from commit b10e170)
@ttuegel ttuegel changed the title [20.09] digikam 7.1.0 [20.09] digikam: 6.4.0 -> 7.1.0 Oct 3, 2020
@ttuegel ttuegel merged commit b5dae77 into NixOS:release-20.09 Oct 3, 2020
@edolstra edolstra mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (new) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
1 participant
@ttuegel