Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rufo (Ruby formatter): init at 0.12.0 #100663

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 5, 2020
Merged

rufo (Ruby formatter): init at 0.12.0 #100663

merged 1 commit into from Nov 5, 2020

Conversation

andersk
Copy link
Contributor

@andersk andersk commented Oct 16, 2020

Motivation for this change

Package Rufo, the Ruby formatter.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
@zakame
Copy link
Member

zakame commented Oct 21, 2020

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 100663 1

1 package built:
  • rufo

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 100663 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:
  • rufo

@roberth
Copy link
Member

roberth commented Nov 5, 2020

Thank you @andersk!

@roberth roberth merged commit f541365 into NixOS:master Nov 5, 2020
@andersk andersk deleted the rufo branch December 26, 2022 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants