Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

volatility: 2.6 -> 2.6.1 #100776

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 1, 2020
Merged

Conversation

Enteee
Copy link
Contributor

@Enteee Enteee commented Oct 16, 2020

Motivation for this change

Bump volatility 2.6 to 2.6.1. Main reason for this: more win10 profiles.
We now need to fetch from GitHub because 2.6.1 is not published on downloads.volatilityfoundation.org.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

cc @bosu

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 100776 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • volatility

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 100776 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:
  • volatility

Co-authored-by: Sandro <sandro.jaeckel@gmail.com>
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 100776 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:
  • volatility

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 100776 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • volatility

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit acd8900 into NixOS:master Dec 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants