Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

firmwareLinuxNonfree: 2020-09-18 -> 2020-10-22 #103028

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 8, 2020

Conversation

TredwellGit
Copy link
Member

Things done

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 103028 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built:
  • firmwareLinuxNonfree
  • microcodeAmd

@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

@SuperSandro2000, the maintainer of this package does not appear to be active. Would you please consider merging this?

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@SuperSandro2000, the maintainer of this package does not appear to be active. Would you please consider merging this?

I can't merge things.

@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry for bothering you; I should have checked.

@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

@NeQuissimus, the maintainer of this package does not appear to be active. Since you update the Linux package, would you please consider merging this?

@NeQuissimus
Copy link
Member

I'll merge this. I'd feel much better if this had a test ;)

@NeQuissimus NeQuissimus merged commit b1bd4c0 into NixOS:master Nov 8, 2020
@TredwellGit TredwellGit deleted the firmwareLinuxNonfree branch November 8, 2020 17:45
@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

This package just provides firmware that is loaded when specific hardware is available; I would write a test, but am unsure how it would work without access to all of that hardware.

This package is updated monthly upstream and since it is required to be updated for new hardware to work and can include security mitigations I would like to ask if it is okay for me to @NeQuissimus message you each month after I prepare the pull request to get it merged in a timely manner unless there is someone else that would be better to contact.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants