New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ocamlPackages.opam-file-format: 2.0.0 -> 2.1.0 #102671
ocamlPackages.opam-file-format: 2.0.0 -> 2.1.0 #102671
Conversation
Found while running nixpkgs-review:
Not sure which packages caused this error. When building all packages on their own this does not happen. Edit: gsl is the failing package. Going to open another PR to fix that. |
Result of 4 packages marked as broken and skipped:
5 packages failed to build:
29 packages built:
python3Packages.bap and libbap
orpie build fixed by #102814 |
@SuperSandro2000 can you test the failing packages on |
python3Packages.bap and libbap build fine on master but now something else fails. I think my builder is a bit flakey and not reliable for ocaml.
|
Is that the build of |
Don't know anymore. Can't reproduce. |
This PR is SPAM. |
This is not true. @r-ryantm is our auto update bot which keeps packages up to date. Please do not call it spam. Thank you. This is especially true if maintainers like you do not keep their packages up to date. |
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/ocaml4.10.0-opam-file-format/versions.
meta.description for ocamlPackages.opam-file-format is: "Parser and printer for the opam file syntax"
meta.homepage for ocamlPackages.opam-file-format is: "https://github.com/ocaml/opam-file-format"
meta.changelog for ocamlPackages.opam-file-format is: ""
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Impact
Checks done (click to expand)
built on NixOS
Warning: a test defined in
passthru.tests
did not pass0 of 0 passed binary check by having a zero exit code.
0 of 0 passed binary check by having the new version present in output.
found 2.1.0 with grep in /nix/store/j5d35m13ngdwgz99v9a457p17hia5341-ocaml4.10.0-opam-file-format-2.1.0
directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/84750c88af8bb67c2c9f068f56bb5033
du listing: https://gist.github.com/e99f3c55feb2eca63278d5be930c3170
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-users
list or you can usesudo
since root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
nixpkgs-review took longer than 45m and timed out
Maintainer pings
cc @vbgl for testing.