Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Re-enable minilitex_ddr_eth 100T DIFF_FASM test once bittools are fixed #1730

Open
acomodi opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Re-enable minilitex_ddr_eth 100T DIFF_FASM test once bittools are fixed #1730

acomodi opened this issue Oct 27, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@acomodi
Copy link
Contributor

acomodi commented Oct 27, 2020

There is an issue with prjxray tools, specifically bitread, which prevents to correctly read the bitstream data, affecting the FASM output.

In particular, certain BRAMS in the bitstream have the INIT values incorrectly read, generating differences in the output FASM files with fasm2bels, such as point 1 in this comment

There is a WIP PR with a fix here.
@mithro mithro changed the title Re-enable minilitex_ddr_eth 100T DIFF_FASM test once bittols are fixed Re-enable minilitex_ddr_eth 100T DIFF_FASM test once bittools are fixed Nov 13, 2020
@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented Nov 13, 2020

@acomodi Has this been fixed now?

@litghost
Copy link
Contributor

@tmichalak has not fixed this yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mithro @litghost @acomodi