New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
xdg_utils: 1.1.3 -> unstable-2020-10-21 #107054
Conversation
Setting WIP to prevent ofborg from going ham before I know if it should target staging instead. |
Not yet sure what is up with bitwig... EDIT: bitwig also doesn't build in master for some reason...
And it seems like the download for HipChat has moved... |
094f3b4
to
775b365
Compare
Fix for the HipChat issue at #107121 |
@SFrijters please resolve the merge conflict. |
There has not been an official release for a long time, but new features and fixes are available
775b365
to
e4e6537
Compare
@SuperSandro2000 Rebased on top of master |
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 1 package built:
|
Motivation for this change
Upstream has not seen an official release since 2018-05, but a number of fixes and improvements have been committed.
It would be nice to have those available, since I don't think there's a release in sight (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-utils/-/issues/178). I've been using an overlay to get a newer version for quite some time now, and I haven't had any issues.
This change affects a number of packages that are expensive to build (e.g. firefoxes, chromes), so I'm not sure if this should target staging instead? The number and size of packages prevents me from running nix-review on my own desktop.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)