New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sub-batch: init at 0.3.0 #108951
sub-batch: init at 0.3.0 #108951
Conversation
Result of 1 package built:
|
5abd0ac
to
186e8ee
Compare
darwin:
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 1 package failed to build and are new build failure:
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 1 package built:
|
186e8ee
to
509cd74
Compare
Upstream doesn't indicate wether it's supposed to run on darwin, so I marked sub-batch as broken on darwin. |
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 1 package built:
|
Motivation for this change
Introduce sub-batch, a nice application for editing subtitles from the CLI.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)