New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
detect-secrets: 0.12.4 -> 0.14.3 #107820
detect-secrets: 0.12.4 -> 0.14.3 #107820
Conversation
@fabaff please fix the eval error. |
562dc09
to
191ef28
Compare
@SuperSandro2000, done. |
191ef28
to
31fa5c6
Compare
31fa5c6
to
b5ce0ea
Compare
, configparser | ||
, enum34 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
, configparser | |
, enum34 |
, functools32 | ||
, future | ||
, isPy27 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
, functools32 | |
, future | |
, isPy27 |
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 4 packages built:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Result of nixpkgs-review pr 107820 run on x86_64-linux 1
4 packages built:
- detect-secrets
- python37Packages.pyahocorasick
- python38Packages.pyahocorasick
- python39Packages.pyahocorasick
Motivation for this change
Update to latest upstream release 0.14.3
Tests are now requiring pyahocorasick.
Changelog: https://github.com/Yelp/detect-secrets/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)