Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gcc-arm-embedded: 9-2020-q2-update -> 10-2020-q4-major #107802

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 29, 2020
Merged

gcc-arm-embedded: 9-2020-q2-update -> 10-2020-q4-major #107802

merged 2 commits into from Dec 29, 2020

Conversation

prusnak
Copy link
Member

@prusnak prusnak commented Dec 28, 2020 •
edited

Motivation for this change

New major version of embedded GCC

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 107802 run on x86_64-linux 1

4 packages built:
  • blackmagic
  • gcc-arm-embedded (gcc-arm-embedded-10)
  • opentx
  • tinygo

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 107802 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package failed to build:
  • tinygo
1 package built:
  • gcc-arm-embedded (gcc-arm-embedded-10)

@prusnak prusnak merged commit 06a3451 into NixOS:master Dec 29, 2020
@prusnak prusnak deleted the gcc-arm-embedded branch December 29, 2020 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (new) 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@prusnak @SuperSandro2000