Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pijul: 1.0.0-alpha.24 -> 1.0.0-alpha.31 #108506

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fabianhjr
Copy link
Member

@fabianhjr fabianhjr commented Jan 5, 2021

Motivation for this change

There have been several fixes to issues and the patch format was changed a bit.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@fabianhjr
Copy link
Member Author

/marvin opt-in
/status needs_reviewer

@marvin-mk2
Copy link

marvin-mk2 bot commented Jan 6, 2021

Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here.

@@ -1,26 +1,28 @@
{ stdenv
, darwin
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not use darwin as an input directly.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I import pkgs then? I am not sure what to do here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The alternative from greping nixpkgs seems to be to import pkgs and substitute darwin for pkgs.darwin.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is even worse. Please do something like

a = callPackages ../ {
  inherit (darwin.apple_sdk.frameworks) Security;
};

in top-level.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh ok, yeah that seems better.

}:

assert gitImportSupport -> libgit2 != null;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
assert gitImportSupport -> libgit2 != null;

, gitImportSupport ? true
, libgit2 ? null
# Optionals
, gitImportSupport ? true, libgit2 ? null
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
, gitImportSupport ? true, libgit2 ? null
, gitImportSupport ? true, libgit2

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch)
If you find some bugs or got suggestions for further things to search or run please reach out to SuperSandro2000 on IRC.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 108506 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • pijul

@fabianhjr
Copy link
Member Author

Close due to another PR updating this package: #108767

@fabianhjr fabianhjr closed this Jan 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants