Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vault: Support multiple config files (no secrets in store) #108411

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 24, 2021

Conversation

roberth
Copy link
Member

@roberth roberth commented Jan 4, 2021

Motivation for this change

Configure storageBackend securely.
Although vault guarantees confidentiality and integrity when its backend is compromised, a leak still compromises the storage backend itself and the availability of vault.

Closes #107323 (earlier attempt, wrong approach)

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

cc maintainers @LnL7 @rushmorem @offlinehacker @pradeepchhetri
cc @aanderse

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/438

@roberth roberth changed the title Vault multiple config files vault: Support multiple config files (no secrets in store) Jan 18, 2021
@roberth
Copy link
Member Author

roberth commented Jan 18, 2021

@LnL7 @rushmorem @offlinehacker @pradeepchhetri Could you please review?

Align with RFC42 language, even if in advance of the actual settings
attribute.
Copy link
Contributor

@cpcloud cpcloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM!

@roberth
Copy link
Member Author

roberth commented Jan 24, 2021

I'm not expecting anything from the listed package maintainers (@LnL7 @rushmorem @offlinehacker @pradeepchhetri) after 34 days of silence, also counting the previous iteration of this PR.

@roberth roberth merged commit 530df49 into NixOS:master Jan 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants