New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bacula: 9.6.6 -> 11.0.0 #107720
bacula: 9.6.6 -> 11.0.0 #107720
Conversation
Result of 1 package built:
|
Result of 1 package built:
|
At first glance I would say that the license is AGPLv3 and not GPL.
The upstream stream project also mentioned BSD-2. The Fedora RPM uses I assume that by mentioning both licenses we are fine (sorry, not a licensing expert here).
|
3869af0
to
fc35229
Compare
@fabaff Good catch, I didn't check that part |
I took only a look because @SuperSandro2000 mentioned that |
fc35229
to
b66f058
Compare
Oops forgot a semicolon, should be better now |
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 1 package built:
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 1 package built:
|
Motivation for this change
Upstream update
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)