-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.5k
treewide: remove maintainership of ma27
from a few packages
#108126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can add me to chkcrontab, yowsup and pyaxmlparser.
@@ -21,6 +21,6 @@ buildPythonPackage rec { | |||
description = " Structure-aware diff for html and xml documents"; | |||
homepage = "https://github.com/christian-oudard/htmltreediff"; | |||
license = licenses.bsdOriginal; | |||
maintainers = with maintainers; [ ma27 ]; | |||
maintainers = with maintainers; [ ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This project did not receive any commits for 10 years. I think this can be potentially removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for a python package, that is especially bad
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the guideline on removing packages? What about projects in compiled languages written in C last updated in 2004, for instance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@siraben if it's still working and providing utility to someone, IMO we should keep it around "forever". If something hasn't broken in 16 years, which would it break now?
Those are packages I don't use anymore for a longer time and I therefore don't think that listing me as maintainer is a good idea. If those should be removed now, I'd be fine with that. SuperSandro2000 will take care of a few packages[1]. [1] NixOS#108126 (review)
Not used anywhere and also not updated for a long time.
00a1962
to
0d3f7b6
Compare
Addressed both of your comments @SuperSandro2000 , thanks! |
Motivation for this change
Those are packages I don't use anymore for a longer time and I therefore
don't think that listing me as maintainer is a good idea. If those
should be removed now, I'd be fine with that.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)