Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide on port pinout marking on the top silkscreen #256

Closed
electroniceel opened this issue Jan 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Decide on port pinout marking on the top silkscreen #256

electroniceel opened this issue Jan 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
hardware Component: hardware revC Hardware revision: C

Comments

@electroniceel
Copy link
Member

kicad
silk

During revC2 development this was added, mostly as an experiment to see how it works out in the prototypes.
Do we want to keep it for future revisions or remove it in revC3?

Pros:

  • We have no other marking on the top side that shows the port assignments
  • Does not cost us anything

Cons:

  • Hard to read
  • Does not look pretty in it's current state
  • The marking is on the outside of the port headers, because that is the only space available. But the outside pins are mostly GND, the numbered pins are inside. The user could get confused by this and has to memorize it.

The protoypes were made at JLCPCB, the final production boards are planned to be made at King Credie. The latter is supposed to have higher quality silkscreen, at least available as an option. So it may look better on the final boards.

There are full pin markings without any confusion issues on the backside silkscreen. Also the aluminium case will have the pinout printed on top. People not using the aluminium case can stick marking tape on the connector shrouds or the lasercut case.

I'm yet undecided, but more leaning for removal because of the inside/outside confusion issue.

@electroniceel
Copy link
Member Author

@esden Could you comment on the silkscreen quality expected by King Credie? Also your opinion on this issue of course.

@electroniceel electroniceel added hardware Component: hardware revC Hardware revision: C labels Jan 1, 2021
@esden
Copy link
Member

esden commented Jan 1, 2021

@electroniceel Regarding the labeling. I think I agree, I am not really using those labels myself (they are as we expected too small to be useful). I also think they might result in confusion as they are on the wrong side of the connector anyways. I think we should remove them. The wire harnesses and their labeling, as well as the markings on the back of the board turn out to be much more useful in practice.

@whitequark
Copy link
Member

whitequark commented Jan 1, 2021

I agree with the removal. Parallax makes the labels easy to accidentally misuse, and they indeed are at the wrong side.

@electroniceel
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, let's remove them

electroniceel added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2021
esden pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2023
whitequark pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2023
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hardware Component: hardware revC Hardware revision: C
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants