New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
linux_zen: 5.10.1 -> 5.10.4 #108239
linux_zen: 5.10.1 -> 5.10.4 #108239
Conversation
5812ea0
to
15a3d40
Compare
Result of 8 packages marked as broken and skipped:
22 packages failed to build:
51 packages built:
|
☝️ Seems slightly better than #107003. |
Result of 8 packages marked as broken and skipped:
22 packages failed to build:
51 packages built:
Code-wise looks ok, didn't really tested the kernel but it is a simple enough version bump. I imagine the module failures are expected? |
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
Can we disable the module that do not build? This would make subsequent updates easier if they build failure count would be not 22. |
I've been wanting to write something which checks for mislabeled modules (or packages in general?) but haven't found the time. You could check semi-manually though if you really want to see this improved. See #102209 which did that for 20.09. |
/marvin opt-in |
Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here. |
The PR author cannot set the status to If you are not the PR author and you are reading this, please review the usage of this bot. You may be able to help. Please make an honest attempt to resolve all outstanding issues before setting to |
/status needs_merger |
Replaced by #108688 |
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)