Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kpack: init at 1.1.0 #95846

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 27, 2020
Merged

kpack: init at 1.1.0 #95846

merged 1 commit into from Aug 27, 2020

Conversation

siraben
Copy link
Member

@siraben siraben commented Aug 20, 2020

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@siraben
Copy link
Member Author

siraben commented Aug 20, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build kpack

@siraben
Copy link
Member Author

siraben commented Aug 21, 2020

Builds on both NixOS and macOS.

@siraben siraben changed the title kpack: init at 1.0.1 kpack: init at 1.1.0 Aug 21, 2020
pkgs/development/tools/misc/kpack/default.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src = fetchFromGitHub {
owner = "KnightOS";
repo = "kpack";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
repo = "kpack";
repo = pname;

@ryantm
Copy link
Member

ryantm commented Aug 22, 2020

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 95846 1

1 package built:
- kpack

Copy link
Member Author

@siraben siraben left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit suggestions

@siraben
Copy link
Member Author

siraben commented Aug 22, 2020

We may want the repo name to differ from the package name, see #95890 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants