New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nwg-launchers: init at 0.2.0 #93189
nwg-launchers: init at 0.2.0 #93189
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a minor nit, otherwise LGTM :)
Thanks! |
commits should be squashed, otherwise lgtm |
Done. Yeah. AFAIK there's no way to accept a proposed change and squad it. Mergers could use "the merge and squash button" but I know the policy is to squash manually. |
Relevant comment from the |
Thanks @berbiche. I updated the PR to wrap The closure's size doesn't seem to change much: We could have an option to wrap it optionally. And maybe have 2 version in I'm very open to comments. Especially from people with more experience with Nix than me. |
/marvin opt-in |
Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here. |
/state needs_review |
/status needs_reviewer |
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good! I think always wrapping is fine because it doesn't add that much.
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)swaylock
needs to be in path. I wonder if we should just wrapresult/bin/nwgbar
.