Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[20.03] zfs: 0.8.3 -> 0.8.4 #92850

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2020
Merged

[20.03] zfs: 0.8.3 -> 0.8.4 #92850

merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2020

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Jul 10, 2020

(cherry picked from commit 1b3825e)

Motivation for this change

5.6 compatibility

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@adisbladis @Mic92
zfs: 0.8.3 -> 0.8.4
fe0b300 
(cherry picked from commit 1b3825e)
@Mic92 Mic92 changed the title zfs: 0.8.3 -> 0.8.4 [20.03] zfs: 0.8.3 -> 0.8.4 Jul 10, 2020
@andir andir merged commit 692c7b3 into NixOS:release-20.03 Jul 10, 2020
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the zfs-backport branch July 10, 2020 22:02
@Atemu Atemu mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@Mic92 @andir @adisbladis