Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ujprog: init at 3.0.92 #95720

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

ujprog: init at 3.0.92 #95720

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

trepetti
Copy link
Contributor

@trepetti trepetti commented Aug 17, 2020

Motivation for this change

ujprog is a JTAG programmer for the ULX3S and ULX2S open source FPGA development boards. The boards use Lattice parts that are capable of being programmed using the reverse engineered prjtrellis and icestorm toolchains, respectively. This addition will allow Nix users to program their devices after generating FPGA bitstreams using the tools described above (both are already packaged in NIx).

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@trepetti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #95867 since fujprog is more actively maintained and has a more flexible build system.

@trepetti trepetti closed this Aug 20, 2020
@trepetti trepetti deleted the ujprog branch September 3, 2020 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant