New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
python.nbxmpp: 0.6.10 → 1.0.2; gajim: 1.1.3 → 1.2.2 #95785
Conversation
@GrahamcOfBorg build python37Packages.nbxmpp gajim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
otherwise diff LGTM, but i don't feel super strongly about it.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/95785
3 packages built:
gajim python37Packages.nbxmpp python38Packages.nbxmpp
pkgs/applications/networking/instant-messengers/gajim/default.nix
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkgs/applications/networking/instant-messengers/gajim/default.nix
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Please follow CONTRIBUTING.md and manual#submitting-changes-making-patches and squash the fix-up commits. This can be done with:
|
Squashed using |
in this case, yes, I could squash all of them to one commit. But, there's a CONTRIBUTING.md item in the template to ensure that the process is easier on those who are reviewing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
diff LGTM
shows usage
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/95785
3 packages built:
gajim python37Packages.nbxmpp python38Packages.nbxmpp
Thanks for reviewing & merging. The contributing guide does not tell what to do when the reviewer suggests changes through the web interface: is it ok to just push the button “apply suggestion” (in which case it produces a new commit that does not comply with the contributing guide)? IMHO, leaving the suggested changes in a separate commit — during the reviewing time only — makes the life of the reviewer easier: they know that their suggestion have been applied as-is. If I instead squash at once, they have to review all the changes again: this might be better regarding the quality of the review, but slightly more time-consuming. |
generally I do the changes on the branch, then
|
It would be nice if they had a |
Motivation for this change
Major release.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)