New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dashboard Python Notebook #10
Comments
@HackerFoo I'm having problems finding where to get the CPD, wirelength, and maximum memory use of each build in Hydra. It doesn't seem to be in the |
For VPR, it's in Here's an example with the data in bold: Number of global nets: 0 Number of routed nets (nonglobal): 16332 Wire length results (in units of 1 clb segments)... Total wirelength: 964295, average net length: 59.0433 Maximum net length: 61343 ... Intra-domain critical path delays (CPDs): sys_clk to sys_clk CPD: 17.7211 ns (56.43 MHz) clk200_clk to clk200_clk CPD: 5.03484 ns (198.616 MHz) Inter-domain critical path delays (CPDs): Intra-domain worst setup slacks per constraint: sys_clk to sys_clk worst setup slack: -1.05506 ns clk200_clk to clk200_clk worst setup slack: -0.034837 ns Inter-domain worst setup slacks per constraint: Geometric mean non-virtual intra-domain period: 9.44577 ns (105.867 MHz) Fanout-weighted geomean non-virtual intra-domain period: 0.26595 ns (3760.11 MHz) Timing analysis took 6.30376 seconds (5.63628 STA, 0.667476 slack) (16 full updates: 0 setup, 0 hold, 16 combined). VPR suceeded The entire flow of VPR took 575.44 seconds (max_rss 3479.8 MiB)
|
PR #217 has been merged into fpga-tool-perf to add these metrics to the meta.json file output in Hydra, which will allow FTPVL to be able to read and visualize the metrics. Future builds will presumably have those metrics included, and hopefully we will have a proof of concept that includes all of them. |
This Colab notebook is the proof-of-concept design of the Symbiflow dashboard that will close this issue. It can be run as an entire notebook and will generate visualizations that allow users to compare performance between evaluations and determine where any regressions occurred. |
@TypingKoala Looks good, thanks! |
Create a notebook that gives a general overview of the trends in fpga-tool-perf that pulls the list of evaluations from Hydra.
This should be easy to automate. It would be nice to also manually attach notes to explain changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: