Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

kbs2: 0.1.6 -> 0.2.1 #106406

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

kbs2: 0.1.6 -> 0.2.1 #106406

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

@r-ryantm r-ryantm commented Dec 9, 2020

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/kbs2/versions.

meta.description for kbs2 is: "A secret manager backed by age"

meta.homepage for kbs2 is: "https://github.com/woodruffw/kbs2"

meta.changelog for kbs2 is: ""

Updates performed
  • Rust version update
To inspect upstream changes
Impact
Checks done (click to expand)
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand) 
4 total rebuild path(s)

1 package rebuild(s)

1 x86_64-linux rebuild(s)
1 i686-linux rebuild(s)
1 x86_64-darwin rebuild(s)
1 aarch64-linux rebuild(s)


First fifty rebuilds by attrpath
kbs2
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/4i72v2pqgmmcv890x2c8pvmkqiaf2gq3-kbs2-0.2.1 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A kbs2 https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/00dfeeecf8b3c71c01056fe2dce4ac998da496ea.tar.gz

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/4i72v2pqgmmcv890x2c8pvmkqiaf2gq3-kbs2-0.2.1
ls -la /nix/store/4i72v2pqgmmcv890x2c8pvmkqiaf2gq3-kbs2-0.2.1/bin

Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

Result of nixpkgs-review 1

1 package built:
  • kbs2
Maintainer pings

cc @marsam for testing.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from marsam December 9, 2020 02:42
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

SuperSandro2000 commented Dec 9, 2020 •
edited

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 106406 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • kbs2
test kbs2::backend::tests::test_ragelib_rewrap_keyfile ... FAILED

failures:

---- kbs2::backend::tests::test_ragelib_rewrap_keyfile stdout ----
thread 'kbs2::backend::tests::test_ragelib_rewrap_keyfile' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: unable to decrypt (backend reports: ExcessiveWork { required: 19, target: 19 })', src/kbs2/backend.rs:300:86
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace


failures:
    kbs2::backend::tests::test_ragelib_rewrap_keyfile

test result: FAILED. 24 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 1 filtered out

error: test failed, to rerun pass '--bin kbs2'

@marsam
Copy link
Contributor

marsam commented Dec 9, 2020

Duplicate of #106133

@marsam marsam marked this as a duplicate of #106133 Dec 9, 2020
@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/kbs2 branch December 10, 2020 03:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@marsam marsam Awaiting requested review from marsam

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@r-ryantm @SuperSandro2000 @marsam