Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Truffle] Regex #casefold? #=== for Symbol #2640

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 2, 2015

Conversation

bjfish
Copy link
Contributor

@bjfish bjfish commented Mar 2, 2015

No description provided.

def casefold?
(options & IGNORECASE) > 0 ? true : false
end

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code came from Rubinius, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's right

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if anyone told you, but we're trying to keep to version 2.4.1 of Rubinius, just to be consistent. We'll probably upgrade later on.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's good to know. Looks like this method is the same in 2.4.1

chrisseaton added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2015
[Truffle] Regex #casefold? #=== for Symbol
@chrisseaton chrisseaton merged commit bdcd2db into jruby:master Mar 2, 2015
@bjfish bjfish deleted the truffle_regex branch March 2, 2015 22:41
@chrisseaton chrisseaton modified the milestone: truffle-dev May 4, 2015
@enebo enebo added this to the Non-Release milestone Dec 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants