@lbat i can reopen this when you are done with the above comments.

hi daniel,
thanks for your feedback!
I adjusted my code according to your suggestions and used the unit test tool. Unfortunately I couldn't find the comment regarding the "@should", but I hope everything is okay now.
Can you reopen the pull request?

test method name:
initially had a more meaningful name :). Then I assumed that there is a naming convention, because all the tests are named like the @should annotation [1]. I thought that the new testcase belongs to the "@should require DatatypeConfiguration..." and therefore named the method ...2(). I was aware that this name is far from ideal and added a description in the method comment.

[1] https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/Unit+Testing+With+at-should+Annotation

@lbat can u comment on the ticket and change its status?