Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Truffle: implement Rubinius-style backtraces #1933

Closed
chrisseaton opened this issue Aug 31, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Truffle: implement Rubinius-style backtraces #1933

chrisseaton opened this issue Aug 31, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
beginner
Milestone
Non-Release

Comments

@chrisseaton
Copy link
Contributor

I implemented a proof of concept Rubinius-style backtrace, but recently removed it as it was only half done. See b54ca29.

We should be able to precisely match the Rubinius backtrace format as in Truffle we have a very good backtrace. Our MRI style backtrace is designed to be character-for-character identical, and we'd like to achieve the same for Rubinius with the obvious exception that we won't include the source of their core methods. Colour would be good as well.

We could then add an option to include the value of locals in each activation, as we do in our debug formatter. See 03c0ca6.
@chrisseaton
Copy link
Contributor Author

We're trying to simplify some of the features we have that aren't necessary so we aren't as keen on this idea any more.

@chrisseaton chrisseaton added this to the truffle-dev milestone Apr 15, 2015
@enebo enebo added this to the Non-Release milestone Dec 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
beginner
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Non-Release
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@enebo @chrisseaton