@ajs6f, in line with the "API partitioning" effort, we will clearly be moving this ontology over to something like "fcrepo4-extras"; but in the meantime, do you or @acoburn have any comments on the content of this document?

I have little to contribute. I do find it somewhat bizarre that "derivativeCreation" and "indexing" are considered events for which one would audit a repository. I assume that there's some good reason for this, and we're not just conflating the auditing of a repository with the auditing of the larger system in which it is a component.

I would echo @ajs6f. I don't have anything against these events, but they seem to be related to a different layer in a DAMS, distinct from the underlying repository itself.

Yes, there seem to be two scopes at play:

• the repository
• the resource

The Audit Service is establishing a pattern for associating events to resources within the repository as well as at-large. Maybe we should separate the "external events" from this current effort... while still providing recipes for how integrators can push external events into the associated triplestore.

I'm fine with removing indexing and derivativeGeneration from the ontology -- and saying that implementers can define their own local types for whatever events they want to track.

The beauty of using Web ontology languages for this purpose is precisely that people can extend them however they want, with or without our input, if we do our job right.

Resolved with: 53756a2