Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Truffle] internalSetGMT need for Time stdlib #2809

Closed
bjfish opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

[Truffle] internalSetGMT need for Time stdlib #2809

bjfish opened this issue Apr 7, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@chrisseaton
Milestone
Non-Release

Comments

@bjfish
Copy link
Contributor

bjfish commented Apr 7, 2015

The time specs currently throw the following UnsupportedOperationException:

Time.xmlschema parses ISO-8601 strings ERROR
RubyTruffleError: internal implementation error - UnsupportedOperationException _set_gmtclass java.lang.Boolean org.jruby.truffle.nodes.core.TimeNodes$InternalSetGMTNode.internalSetGMT(TimeNodes.java:60)
core:/core/rubinius/common/time.rb:213:in `localtime': internal implementation error - UnsupportedOperationException _set_gmtclass java.lang.Boolean org.jruby.truffle.nodes.core.TimeNodes$InternalSetGMTNode.internalSetGMT(TimeNodes.java:60) (RubyTruffleError)
    from /Users/brandonfish/Documents/jruby/lib/ruby/truffle/mri/../../stdlib/time.rb:183:in `force_zone!'
    from /Users/brandonfish/Documents/jruby/lib/ruby/truffle/mri/../../stdlib/time.rb:584:in `xmlschema'
@chrisseaton chrisseaton added this to the truffle-dev milestone Apr 11, 2015
@chrisseaton chrisseaton self-assigned this Apr 18, 2015
@chrisseaton
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in 709766f - none of the specs pass though, for various reasons unrelated to this issue.

@enebo enebo added this to the Non-Release milestone Dec 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chrisseaton chrisseaton

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Non-Release
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@enebo @bjfish @chrisseaton