Convert module namespace: s|PDL|PDLA| #3
Comments
How about using PDL::Agile rather than polluting a top level namespace? We can then alias that to PDLA. |
Definitely worth considering. So all the functions would sit under |
Yes, and we could alias that to *PDLA if we don't want to type so much. |
Considered. No. |
Issues dealt with so far: had to rename a few files/dirs from
|
Currently-failing tests:
|
The subclassing ones were solved by switching |
Storable one was due to supplied test data files having a leading length byte before "PDLA" not having been updated, plus space-padding after |
We should have an xt test that searches for all |
@devel-chm I'm quite enjoying the irony of you being against polluting a top-level namespace while PDL claims to provide a module called (and this is its full name): This is one of the problems PDLA will be fixing shortly: #4 |
Ed, I have co-maint or better for all PDL dist so I can make releases. And --Chris On Aug 29, 2015 11:08 AM, "mohawk2" notifications@github.com wrote:
|
It's a shame that all that proponent-ing hasn't lead to any identifiable activity in the last year. |
wow |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: