There is lack of clarity in the preferred way of adding java extensions #1740

monkstone · 2014-06-11T09:33:59Z

@headius previous posting #825 had both me and @yokolet foxed
....The "service" model of getting the code to load has largely (but unofficially) been deprecated in favor of simply using Java integration to boot up the extension directly, as seen in JRuby's OpenSSL ruby bits:....
I took in to mean that we should now be following the example of OpenSSL as I have done for my Vec3Library and loading the code like this but it would nice to get confirmation. Also is my use of java-8-lambda as suggested by NetBeans to replace ObjectAllocator() a good move!!!

…sion.

monkstone · 2015-08-28T04:51:16Z

Apparenty @headius was referring to BasicLibraryService since LibraryService is now being promoted, however there is clearly tmtowtdi, including implementing Library as used by @headius and @enebo and in the absence of clarification thats what I used in ruby-processing / JRubyArt

monkstone mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2015

inspect not returning ruby String in jruby-9.0.0.0 #2517

Closed

monkstone referenced this issue in purbon/jruby-examples Aug 25, 2015

Initial commit with basic class and object creation for a jruby exten…

e993885

…sion.

monkstone closed this as completed Aug 28, 2015

enebo added this to the Non-Release milestone Sep 2, 2015

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

GitHub Sponsors

There is lack of clarity in the preferred way of adding java extensions #1740

There is lack of clarity in the preferred way of adding java extensions #1740

monkstone commented Jun 11, 2014

monkstone commented Aug 28, 2015

There is lack of clarity in the preferred way of adding java extensions #1740

There is lack of clarity in the preferred way of adding java extensions #1740

Comments

monkstone commented Jun 11, 2014

monkstone commented Aug 28, 2015