New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated README. #15
Updated README. #15
Conversation
#fcrepo-module-auth-webac | ||
WebAC Authorization Delegate Module for the Fedora 4 Repository. This is an implementation of the W3C's WebAccessControl draft specification at: [https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl](https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl). | ||
|
||
This modules enables an ACL based access control to the fedora repository. Each protected resource should have a ACL file associated with it either directly or via an ancestor. The ACL file defines authorization based on three entities: 1) who has access, 2) what are the access permissions, and 3) to which resource. Please refer the above W3C specification for the ontology of the ACL RDF file. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo: This module(s)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
capitalize fedora
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo: should have a(n)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add link to the WebAC ontology
25b73cf
to
cf5f701
Compare
[https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA4x/WebAC+Authorization+Delegate](https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA4x/WebAC+Authorization+Delegate) | ||
|
||
###Deployment and Configuration | ||
The [fcrepo-webapp-plus](https://github.com/fcrepo4-exts/fcrepo-webapp-plus) provides a convenient option to build fcrepo-webapp that is bundled with the WebAC module. Refer to the [fcrepo-webapp-plus README](https://github.com/fcrepo4-exts/fcrepo-webapp-plus/blob/master/README.md) for instructions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of fcrepo-webapp
, maybe replace it with specific text, like ...build the deployable Fedora web application that...
### Deployment and Configuration | ||
The [fcrepo-webapp-plus](https://github.com/fcrepo4-exts/fcrepo-webapp-plus) provides a convenient option to build fcrepo-webapp that is bundled with the WebAC module. Refer to the [fcrepo-webapp-plus README](https://github.com/fcrepo4-exts/fcrepo-webapp-plus/blob/master/README.md) for instructions. | ||
|
||
The "Example Scenarios" section in the [WebAC Authorization Delegate wiki page](https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA4x/WebAC+Authorization+Delegate) has configuration instructions for some of the common authorization scenarios. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a super picky point, but you could link directly to this section with an anchor
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA4x/WebAC+Authorization+Delegate#WebACAuthorizationDelegate-ExampleScenarios
Otherwise it looks good.
👍
👍 |
@@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ | |||
# fcrepo-module-auth-webac | |||
WebAC Authorization Delegate Module for the Fedora 4 Repository | |||
WebAC Authorization Delegate Module for the Fedora 4 Repository. This is an implementation of the W3C's WebAccessControl draft specification at: [https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl](https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this isn't even a draft specification, I wonder if we shouldn't use the phrase "proposed WebAccessControl" instead of "WebAccessControl draft specification"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @acoburn on this.
👍 |
Resolved with 12096f1 |
No description provided.