-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
Commit
- 9.4.12.0
- 9.4.11.0
- 9.4.10.0
- 9.4.9.0
- 9.4.8.0
- 9.4.7.0
- 9.4.6.0
- 9.4.5.0
- 9.4.4.0
- 9.4.3.0
- 9.4.2.0
- 9.4.1.0
- 9.4.0.0
- 9.3.15.0
- 9.3.14.0
- 9.3.13.0
- 9.3.12.0
- 9.3.11.0
- 9.3.10.0
- 9.3.9.0
- 9.3.8.0
- 9.3.7.0
- 9.3.6.0
- 9.3.5.0
- 9.3.4.0
- 9.3.3.0
- 9.3.2.0
- 9.3.1.0
- 9.3.0.0
- 9.2.21.0
- 9.2.20.1
- 9.2.20.0
- 9.2.19.0
- 9.2.18.0
- 9.2.17.0
- 9.2.16.0
- 9.2.15.0
- 9.2.14.0
- 9.2.13.0
- 9.2.12.0
- 9.2.11.1
- 9.2.11.0
- 9.2.10.0
- 9.2.9.0
- 9.2.8.0
- 9.2.7.0
- 9.2.6.0
- 9.2.5.0
- 9.2.4.1
- 9.2.4.0
- 9.2.3.0
- 9.2.2.0
- 9.2.1.0
- 9.2.0.0
- 9.1.17.0
- 9.1.16.0
- 9.1.15.0
- 9.1.14.0
- 9.1.13.0
- 9.1.12.0
- 9.1.11.0
- 9.1.10.0
- 9.1.9.0
- 9.1.8.0
- 9.1.7.0
- 9.1.6.0
- 9.1.5.0
- 9.1.4.0
- 9.1.3.0
- 9.1.2.0
- 9.1.1.0
- 9.1.0.0
- 9.0.5.0
There are no files selected for viewing
2 comments
on commit 5a7bd3f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the thing here is that "uri:classloader://META-INF/jruby.home" is just treated as a filesystem path and normalizing means to replace "//" with "/"
so the problem is that sometimes you have "://" and sometimes you have not depending on the execution path and whether there was some normalization or canonicalization happening or not.
with the file protocol it even does change the meaning of the path as file://hostname/path is different from file:/hostname/path where hostname is just a directory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thought so, thanks. just wanted to make sure I do not break anything - build should be 💚 🍵
@mkristian going to revert the :/ part to :// as the adjustment: b4a29df fails these integration tests again - seems its not a good idea to rely on getPath as it always changes
://
to:/
which seems surprising to me, or am I wrong here?