Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't query on JCR types #5

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 5, 2015
Merged

don't query on JCR types #5

merged 2 commits into from Nov 5, 2015

Conversation

acoburn
Copy link
Contributor

@acoburn acoburn commented Nov 5, 2015

@ajs6f
Copy link
Contributor

ajs6f commented Nov 5, 2015

Is the idea here basically to show that we aren't publishing the JCR types?

@acoburn
Copy link
Contributor Author

acoburn commented Nov 5, 2015

@ajs6f The upstream changes removed the hasPrimaryType property from the response, so I could either remove this test, invert its logic or add a new test for some different property.

@ajs6f
Copy link
Contributor

ajs6f commented Nov 5, 2015

I say remove it (possibly add a new test if you think it good) because ideally, fcrepo-transform will not depend on the existence of the JCR universe, and we don't want to call attention to JCR here.

@awoods
Copy link
Member

awoods commented Nov 5, 2015

👍 @ajs6f to removing the JCR-ish test.

@acoburn
Copy link
Contributor Author

acoburn commented Nov 5, 2015

The JCR test is now gone.

ajs6f added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2015
@ajs6f ajs6f merged commit 7d433ab into master Nov 5, 2015
@ajs6f ajs6f deleted the fcrepo-1765 branch November 5, 2015 14:56
@awoods
Copy link
Member

awoods commented Nov 5, 2015

This would have been a great time to squash/merge :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants