This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 300
WIP: add and cat big file test (failing) #131
Merged
Merged
+63
−11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thanks @diasdavid for this, I did test cat on the terminal but with an earlier version. I will take a look at this later today. |
@diasdavid just pushed two commits improving this, but on my machine cating the file still takes way too long and times out, so we should use sth smaller for our tests. |
nvm, tests pass again :)
|
@dignifiedquire try again please, should pass now :) |
Still intrigued why the API doesn't think a big file is a stream and not chunked stream: true chunked: false
✓ cat BIG file (146ms) |
a393d28
to
4cb5a2c
Compare
daviddias
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2015
WIP: add and cat big file test (failing)
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was suspecting that something could be weird when adding big files and it seems I was right to have my suspicion (context https://botbot.me/freenode/ipfs/2015-11-21/?msg=54623933&page=6), however, I might be missing something, please review.
It seems that when cat'ing a big file, the parsing chunks one by one breaks the final file:
https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-api/blob/master/src/request-api.js#L35-L46