Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/mmffcharges #142

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Feature/mmffcharges #142

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

johnmay
Copy link
Member

@johnmay johnmay commented Aug 9, 2015

… by MMFF's model. Ideally we would seperate out the aromaticity to a optional preprocessing step but at the moment the aromaticity needs to be assigned after the initial symbolic types.
… in the validation suite and labelled as *new* in the parameter files but do not appear in the papers.
…functionality of the ForceFieldConfigurator/MMFF94BasedParameterSetReader.
…or and rebase using SMILES (required due to InChI standardisations).
@johnmay
Copy link
Member Author

johnmay commented Aug 9, 2015

Rebased as it didn't have the travis debug turned off.

@egonw egonw self-assigned this Aug 18, 2015
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Ignore;
import org.junit.Test;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, this class only has a @before but no @test's? Maybe remove it then?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parent tests are run for the descriptors right? The before sets the class of descriptor. I tried to adapt these tests but since MMFF varies with tautomers it was impossible to match up the expected outputs. All have been migrated though to MmffTest.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe could be @BeforeClass

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Parent tests] Ah, good point! Sorry, did not think of that yesterday.

@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Aug 18, 2015

I will later test for (unexpected) regressions. But generally looks great!

@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Aug 19, 2015

Applied and pushed.

@egonw egonw closed this Aug 19, 2015
@johnmay johnmay deleted the feature/mmffcharges branch August 19, 2015 19:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants