New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/mmffcharges #142
Feature/mmffcharges #142
Conversation
… by MMFF's model. Ideally we would seperate out the aromaticity to a optional preprocessing step but at the moment the aromaticity needs to be assigned after the initial symbolic types.
… in the validation suite and labelled as *new* in the parameter files but do not appear in the papers.
…functionality of the ForceFieldConfigurator/MMFF94BasedParameterSetReader.
…or and rebase using SMILES (required due to InChI standardisations).
8c75d3d
to
a5cb8ee
Compare
Rebased as it didn't have the travis debug turned off. |
import org.junit.Before; | ||
import org.junit.Ignore; | ||
import org.junit.Test; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Parent tests are run for the descriptors right? The before sets the class of descriptor. I tried to adapt these tests but since MMFF varies with tautomers it was impossible to match up the expected outputs. All have been migrated though to MmffTest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe could be @BeforeClass
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Parent tests] Ah, good point! Sorry, did not think of that yesterday.
I will later test for (unexpected) regressions. But generally looks great! |
Applied and pushed. |
http://efficientbits.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/mmff-partial-charges-improvements-in-cdk.html