Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDF'ed serialization #478

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

whikloj
Copy link
Collaborator

@whikloj whikloj commented Sep 17, 2014

  • added new RDF format with IS_IN_FORMAT relation
  • added separate RDFS_LABEL to the RDF format
  • pointed object HAS_SERIALIZATION to RDF format
  • added getSerializationTitle to bridge HAS_SERIALIZATION -> IS_IN_FORMAT -> RDFS_LABEL gap
  • modified unit test
  • updated views page

Resolves https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/65221404

giuliah and others added 2 commits September 16, 2014 13:19
- added getSerializationTitle to bridge HAS_SERIALIZATION -> IS_IN_FORMAT -> RDFS_LABEL gap
- modified unit test
- updated views page

Resolves https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/65221404
final Resource formatRDF = createResource(REPOSITORY_NAMESPACE + key);
model.add(formatRDF, RDFS_LABEL, key);
model.add(format, IS_IN_FORMAT, formatRDF);
// TODO: Check if there are alternative/better choices to express the
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- Added to dc:format to Repository objects to cover mode:root nodeTypes (homepage of admin interface)
- Removed hack from getObjectTitle
- Modified common-node-actions to use new serialization Titles for both export and import select boxes
@awoods
Copy link

awoods commented Sep 18, 2014

Resolved with: b0fe421

Addresses: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/65221404

@awoods awoods closed this Sep 18, 2014
@whikloj whikloj deleted the fcrepo-rdf-serialize branch September 18, 2014 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants