Skip to content

Commit 4193e6e

Browse files
committedNov 7, 2014
Try to fix ul formatting.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1 parent ae52fad commit 4193e6e

1 file changed

+9
-7
lines changed
 

‎_posts/2014-11-05-Playing-with-invertible-bloom-lookup-tables-and-bitcoin-transactions.md

+9-7
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -208,13 +208,15 @@ additional hashSum. In effect, our id field replaces hashSum.
208208

209209
## Results and Suggestions ##
210210

211-
* 8 bytes per slice is too small, larger sizes should be explored.
212-
* 1M is vast overkill for the current network; as well as making block
213-
propagation slower than the current scheme, it's unnecessary for now.
214-
30k is probably more than enough for current blocks.
215-
* Nodes may want to include discarded doublespend transactions in their
216-
IBLT since it's cheaper to include a transaction for consideration
217-
than to extract one which we didn't consider.
211+
<ul>
212+
<li>8 bytes per slice is too small, larger sizes should be explored. </li>
213+
<li>1M is vast overkill for the current network; as well as making block
214+
propagation slower than the current scheme, it's unnecessary for now.
215+
30k is probably more than enough for current blocks.</li>
216+
<li>Nodes may want to include discarded doublespend transactions in their
217+
IBLT since it's cheaper to include a transaction for consideration
218+
than to extract one which we didn't consider.</li>
219+
</ul>
218220

219221
## Flaws and Future Work ##
220222

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
Please sign in to comment.