Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Added integration test for testing CRUD concurrent performance with up to 32 threads. #366

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Added integration test for testing CRUD concurrent performance with up to 32 threads. #366

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lsitu
Copy link
Contributor

@lsitu lsitu commented May 16, 2014

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/s/projects/684825/stories/70724622
Integration test is added for CRUD concurrent performance testing with 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 threads to create, update, retrieve and delete objects and content files.

awoods
awoods reviewed May 19, 2014
View reviewed changes
fcrepo-http-api/src/test/java/org/fcrepo/integration/http/api/AbstractResourceIT.java
* @author lsitu
*
*/
class HttpRunner implements Runnable {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since no other child class is using HttpRunner, shall we move it into FedoraCrudConcurrentIT.java?

@lsitu
Copy link
Contributor Author

lsitu commented May 20, 2014

I've moved the HttpRunner from AbstractResourceIT.java to FedoraCrudConcurrentIT.java as suggested, and added average response time for graph drawing (see https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FF/Fedora+4+Properties+CRUD+Performance+Testing), along with the missing tests for content files retrieval.

@bseeger
Copy link
Contributor

bseeger commented Nov 6, 2015

Hello @lsitu,
We are cleaning up the fcrepo4 repository on github. This pull request of yours was last updated on May 19, 2014. If you feel that it is still relevant, can you please create an issue for this in Jira and rebase your branch to eliminate merge conflicts. Otherwise, we would appreciate it you would close this pull request.

If we don't hear from you before November 20th, 2015, we will close it for you.

Thank you!

@lsitu lsitu closed this Nov 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@lsitu @bseeger @awoods