Mark unspecified double bond steroechemistry when labelling bonds of a d... #115
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
...epiction.
Double bond conformation is indicated by atom positions - when the conformation is unspecified we need to explicitly mark it as such. This can be done with wavy bonds (recommended by IUPAC) or crossed bonds (needed sometimes).
The code doesn't do a full stereo perception and so may add wavy bonds when not needed but this is better then leaving them off and accidentally indicating it. It's actually a lot more difficult to prove something isn't a stereo centre then to say it is. Double bonds in macro cycles are a problem but they are generally with our current stereochemistry - will think about a fix for that this month.
Example: