Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Revert "add rel=author links to Google+ to pod and release pages in o…
…rder to provide Author information to Google" This reverts commit 7c8b1d6. I'm reverting this commit because it's a bit controversial. The following problems: 1) We already have the "plus" icon on author pages, so this duplicates the image. 2) There has been some concern that this places Google in a more prominent position than other search engines for no apparent gain. 3) It's not clear (to me) what the real difference between rel="me" and rel="author" is. Probably we should decide on how we want to handle that and then do it without adding an extra image. We do have the Coderwall endorse button under author images where appropriate, but that button serves a different purpose and it also relays some info about the author. So, I think that with this particular commit, we'd just need some more discussion as to whether it's really needed and how best to implement it.
- Loading branch information
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Afaik, this was necessary for showing the author in the Google search. Otherwise Google won't be able to establish that connection.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed the link to the g+ page of the author with ?rel=author attached is needed for the author image to show up on Google.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1408986?hl=en
It does not need to be a G+ button it can be a simple link, probably even a 1-dot image linked to G+. Google has a tool to check after this
is implemented if the small link is enough.
In addition, the code could be a bit more clever to add this other button only when the other one is not on the page.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My confusion is about rel="me" and rel="author". On the author page, for example, we already have:
Do we need to change the G+ rel to author rather than me?
I see that reverting the patch removes the rel from /pod, so we need to add that back. The 1x1 transparent dot seems like a good way to go for this, assuming that's good enough for google.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rel="me" means that this is the page of the author, rel="author" means that this link forwards to the page of the author.
We might as well just add a display: none stylesheet to the link on the /pod page. Should do the trick. Google won't mind. It's just semantics.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What exactly was this attempting to solve?
We already had the author images in google search results.
We have
rel="me"
on the author page (803a88c) andrel="author"
on the links to the author page (87a971b).Reading that google answer link it sounds like the rules have changed (but the old way worked for some people at least),
so maybe that's the problem.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The author images started to show up after the rel="author" links were added.
I am not aware of any changes in the rules on how to connect articles to Google author information.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember seeing icons before this as well. I think it's just a matter of knowing why we are doing X as opposed to Y and then hiding links either with the dot or CSS.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you think these rel=author links are not necessary then, remove them, and then we can see what happens.
I am not attached to them.
347471a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ioncache is about to push a commit that restores and hides the links.