We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Old usage:
use Inline C => using => 'ParseRecDescent';
New syntax:
use Inline C => using => 'Inline::C::Parser::RecDescent';
Or:
use Inline C => using => 'RecDescent';
We need to provide special support for the 2 old parsers to DTRT:
ParseRecDescent
ParseRegExp
Maybe with tests :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Have a hash in Inline::C: my %OLDPARSER2NEW = qw(ParseRecDescent Inline::C::Parser::RecDescent ParseRegExp Inline::C::Parser::RegExp);
And the USING-handler does: $class = $OLDPARSER2NEW{$class} || $class;
Big question: USING is currently handled in Inline proper; could Inline::C::validate do the above mapping?
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think this is handled now. Closing.
No branches or pull requests
Old usage:
New syntax:
Or:
We need to provide special support for the 2 old parsers to DTRT:
ParseRecDescent
ParseRegExp
Maybe with tests :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: